Why does Scott argue that gender is a “useful category of historical analysis”?

Swamped with your writing assignments? Take the weight off your shoulder!

Submit your assignment instructions

Read “Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” available on Blackboard under “Course Content.” Scott’s 1986 article, a landmark in the history of women and gender, establishes how “gender” is distinct” from “sex” (in other words, “gender” is not a synonym for “women”) and can offer, as she puts it, a “useful category of historical analysis.” Note that this reading is a bit denser and more academic than some of our other readings, so take your time and have a dictionary handy. The lecture briefly contextualizes Scott’s intervention, but if you feel like you need more context for the reading, you might also read a 2014 blog post, “Joan W. Scott’s Critical History of Inequality,” by Clyde Plumauzille (link: https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/plumauzille-scott) and a short 2010 retrospective by Scott on the 1986 article (link: https://we.riseup.net/assets/569609/Scott.pdf).
In your initial post, which should be at least 250 words long and should quote at least one line from one of the readings, respond to the reading: why does Scott argue that gender is a “useful category of historical analysis”? Complete your initial post (at least 250 words) by 5:00pm and your two responses (at least 100 to 150 words long each) by 6:00pm

Swamped with your writing assignments? Take the weight off your shoulder!

Submit your assignment instructions

Place this order or similar order and get exceptional paper written by our team of experts at an affordable price

Leave a Reply